George Washington
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,256  Ryan Tucker FR 34:08
1,422  Alex Dadds SR 34:22
1,752  Kyle Ames FR 34:52
1,931  John-Louis Pane SO 35:09
1,950  Jackson Carnes JR 35:11
2,277  Ben Curtis FR 35:40
2,722  Tyler Gillies SO 36:49
2,844  Robert Craven FR 37:22
2,954  John Perrino SO 37:57
National Rank #214 of 311
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #21 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 46.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Ryan Tucker Alex Dadds Kyle Ames John-Louis Pane Jackson Carnes Ben Curtis Tyler Gillies Robert Craven John Perrino
Mason Invitational 09/29 1237 34:09 34:25 34:19 34:40 35:22 35:40 35:42 37:22 37:50
Princeton Invitational 10/13 1267 34:07 34:35 35:24 35:07 35:11 37:17
Atlantic 10 Championships 10/27 1246 34:12 34:09 34:45 36:01 34:07 37:50 38:06
Mid-Atlantic Region 11/09 1315 34:11 35:05 35:09 35:55 36:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.4 601 0.0 0.0 1.3 3.9 8.0 13.3 19.5 26.0 20.5 7.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ryan Tucker 96.5
Alex Dadds 107.0
Kyle Ames 124.1
John-Louis Pane 133.1
Jackson Carnes 134.0
Ben Curtis 149.9
Tyler Gillies 184.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 1.3% 1.3 16
17 3.9% 3.9 17
18 8.0% 8.0 18
19 13.3% 13.3 19
20 19.5% 19.5 20
21 26.0% 26.0 21
22 20.5% 20.5 22
23 7.5% 7.5 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0